Recently I reported on the director of the Penn libraries, who was under investigation for charges of child pornography. Apparently, he is not alone (except in the creepy loner pedophile mode). How can professional librarians, of such high stature, have such poor discretionary skills? I mean, come on, using a library computer to traffic porn? Kiddie porn, no less. And these aren't random support staffers either. These are directors. How does their judgment get so clouded? And as I mentioned last time, what does it say about other decisions that they've made?