Archive for April, 2008

20
Apr

The wrong goal?

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Commentary

Meredith Farkas tackles the issue of what to tell newcomers to the profession when they ask how she’s done so much in so little time in the profession. Seeing as I’m clearly suffering from logorrhea this weekend, it made more sense to talk about it here, rather than in her blog comments.

The ultimate question from the post: “What advice would you offer a new librarian looking to start speaking, writing and networking on a national level?”

There’s a part of me that says they have the wrong goal in mind (excepting the networking part). As Meredith said, most people who are seen as movers and shakers didn’t set out to be movers and shakers.

But there’s the other part of me that says there aren’t any barriers to writing on a national or global level, so what’s the issue? Just do it. That’s how I got started. There are so very few impediments to self-publishing online that it’s unfathomable that anyone who wants to be writing isn’t doing it.

But as I said, I’m not sure I can recommend focusing on speaking and writing as a goal in and of itself for the new librarian. Following the sage wisdom of Walt Crawford, first have something to say. Figure out what gets you excited in the profession (or outside of it!) and write about it. Get that blog started. Share your passion. Share your experiences. But remember that the writing, while immensely valuable, is not the experience itself, at least not for most newbies.

At the same time that you’re writing, join conversations, whether on other blogs, Twitter, wherever. And when you join those conversations, don’t forget to tell people what you’re doing and where to find you. Self-promote. Tactfully, yet shamelessly. We’re notoriously poor self-promoters in this profession. It’s an undervalued, misunderstood skill amongst library professionals.

Soon, you’ll find that you’re the one starting conversations. And that’s when you’ll know that you’re starting to find your unique voice. Those conversations are often the ones that turn into mainstream articles or conference presentations.

And if you plan on speaking, you’d best be submitting proposals, because until you’ve established yourself as a speaker, people aren’t going to come looking for you.

If I can be said to be on the right path to “making a name for myself” in library land, I attribute it to two things: good timing and, exactly as Meredith said, “seeing an unfilled need and filling it.”

Good timing, because I started my blog over five years ago, when there weren’t nearly as many voices in the blogosphere. I was noticed simply for listening to Sonic Youth, which I’m not sure is a realistic expectation these days. [Note that said post from Mr. Cohen was my first taste of librarian-related fanboy giddiness.]

That link from Library Stuff was really the beginning of everything else that happened to me outside of my day job. It crystallized the potential of the blogging medium and emboldened me to keep going. Not long after, I stumbled into something of a niche searching for new library blogs. This led not only to my stint as the LIS Weblogs editor at DMOZ, but to LIS Blogsource (big ups to all five of you who remember it!) and to my first national conference presentation, talking about blog search.

And again, good timing when it came to seeing a need and filling it. Librarianship needed a podcaster. I needed something to obsess over. A library podcaster was born.

“Anyway, enough of me talking about me,” he said self-referentially. In the end, I agree with Meredith: Writing and speaking have been benefits of being passionate, curious, motivated and willing to put myself out there. I didn’t set out to be a writer/speaker. I still don’t think of myself that way. In fact, one of the main draws of librarianship was the opportunity to “do the research and not write the paper.” But that’s a different blog post for another day.

20
Apr

A moment for egomania

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Podcasting, Tangent

I’ll admit to a certain amount of fanboy giddiness when people that I respect outside of the library blogosphere (and even oftentimes within it) notice what I’m doing. I was pretty excited when Jason Calacanis twittered/tumbld about his consumption of Uncontrolled Vocabulary, specifically the episode where we discussed Mahalo. And, from what I can tell, just about anything Jason mentions becomes a page on Mahalo.

Today, I got to revisit that same sense of giddiness upon discovering that Cali Lewis of GeekBrief.TV discussed Uncontrolled Vocabulary in her presentation to the Texas Library Association. It sounds like her experience was something of a disaster, so I particularly appreciate that she managed to fit the show into her session and the notes for the presentation.

So thanks, Cali. Go check out GeekBrief.TV, if you haven’t already. It’s a tightly-produced three to five minute videocast, released four times a week, covering “news about technology, consumer electronics, and Web 2.0 projects.” You may as well start with GBTV #346, where Cali makes her apology to the Texas Library Association.

19
Apr

Pecha Kucha, the Video

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Conferences, Podcasting

As I suggested in an earlier post from last week, the Pecha Kucha session at Computers in Libraries was videotaped by Michael Sauers. That video is now available at blip.tv.

But let’s try to embed it here:

It’s almost an hour long, but well worth your time. As far as my presentation is concerned, which is second of the six, the video recording solves the two primary problems of the screencast: the low volume of the embedded audio clips and the lack of audience response. So even if you watched the screencast, I strongly encourage you to check out the video. Be sure to watch Greg Notess’ response as the skeptic (last of the six presentations) and stick around for the Q&A.

19
Apr

Free Britannica

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Resources

I saw this post on TechCrunch indicating that the online Encyclopedia Britannica is now available without charge to web publishers. The definition of web publisher is charmingly broad, while hedging accordingly: “This program is intended for people who publish with some regularity on the Internet, be they bloggers, webmasters, or writers. We reserve the right to deny participation to anyone who in our judgment doesn’t qualify.” To apply for access, go to this page. I received a response with a validation code within an hour.

From what I can tell, what you actually get is a free one-year subscription. At least that’s what the subscription process makes it look like. But all other indications suggest that the offer is for indefinite access, so perhaps they just want to re-evaluate participants annually.

One of the subscriber “benefits” is the ability to link to full-text content from the EB and let any of your readers access that content without charge. So if I wanted to help you examine the story about Venezuela and the Library of Congress that was discussed in Uncontrolled Vocabulary #38, I could point you in the direction of the EB article on the Library of Congress or the article on Venezuela. Of course, I’m a librarian; I can do better than that, but that’s not the point.

Why such a generous offer, you ask? Here’s what EB has to say to that exact question: “Britannica covers a wide range of topics with thousands of articles and multimedia features. They’re relevant and useful, and we’d like more people to be able to take advantage of them.”

You can almost taste the altruism, no? It’s all about the link love, of course. More precisely, I imagine it’s about the Google juice that comes from said link love, which is so hard for a walled garden like EB to accumulate. I’m sure this will be the one and only time I feed the beast.

Updated 4/20/08 12:29 AM: Jason Griffey offers up a far more cogent and critical analysis of the issues attending Britannica Webshare.

19
Apr

Making a TwitteRetreat

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Tangent

I had to face a tough realization yesterday: My Twitterstream has grown too large for me to possibly stay afloat in it. At the time of writing this post, I’m following 121 Twitter accounts. It takes far too much of my mental energy to stay on top of the conversations that are taking place.

And, unfortunately for my readily engaged mind, those conversations are interesting. Twitter is another one of those creations that has proven to be a major time-suck for me. My experience with it echoes, in noteworthy ways, my Second Life experience. I would lose hours upon hours in Second Life and have no idea where all the time went.

Looking back, I recognize that most of that time was spent engaging in near-synchronous conversation. Like normal conversation, only slower.

Twitter is really the same thing, except, for me, the conversation is happening amongst 121 people, each of whom is also talking to all of the people in their unique network. It’s a busy conversation that keeps going 24 hours a day, peaking during business hours and early evening in the US, exactly when I need to be focused on other things.

I eventually made the decision to step away from Second Life. I’ve never been good at doing something partway and Second Life required a substantial commitment to be meaningful. I’ve only been back infrequently since and it’s never had the same pull that it did initially, when I felt truly connected to what was going on there.

The amount of commitment that Twitter has drawn from me suggests that the time has come for me to make a similarly aggressive move there.

Stepping away from Twitter will have consequences. I’ll miss conversations of which I would like to be a part. I’ll be less connected to many of the people I think of as my friends in the professional sphere. I’ll miss many of the things that the people I trust find interesting (but not interesting enough to write full blog posts about them). In short, I’ll be out of the loop. But what I gain back is more important: I recover a big chunk of my own head space.

Of course, there are other ways of managing the Twitter experience. Many other Twitterers are able to find balance in a way that I’m not sure is possible with the way I currently use Twitter. For example, I don’t have to follow everyone who follows me, but I’m naturally interested in people who are interested in me. A nice notion, but it doesn’t scale well.

I don’t actually have to pay attention to other people’s updates at all. I could still push my updates out to whomever was inclined to listen. And maybe that’s what I’ll do in the long run, but I’m not presently comfortable with the notion. It’s a far cry from the Twitter presence I’ve established.

I certainly invite your suggestions. Tell me your strategy for managing the Twitter stream in the comments for this post. I’m more than willing to reconsider my approach and, in many ways, I’d like to find some sort of compromise between the dueling sides of my brain.

Either way, I’ll likely pop into Twitter occasionally, out of curiosity. I suspect that I’ll feel sufficiently removed from the conversation such that I won’t find nearly the same enjoyment in it that I do now. And that will reinforce my decision to have stepped away. But we’ll see.

There is another post in all of this about managing the growth of one’s social network. I have seven Twitter follower requests for people I don’t know. But I’ll write about that on a different day. If you want to join my social network, find me on Facebook. Oh, and when you do, start a conversation, won’t you? I like my connections to include some actual connectivity.

17
Apr

Deepening the Collection Development

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Uncategorized

My good friend from grad school, Rudy Leon, decided she needed a forum for talking about collection development and, not being satisfied with any of the currently available discussions, took matters into her own hands. Her CollectionDevelopment Google group, started just this past Tuesday, already has 182 members, so it would appear the need was there. Go get ‘em, Rudy.

And, um, Rudy, feel free to add me to your blogroll whenever the spirit moves you. I am blogging these days, after all. ;-)

17
Apr

Blog It

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Bloggery

My curiosity compels me to test out new things and there’s been plenty of talk in the tech blogosphere about Six Apart’s new Blog It app for Facebook. It allows you to post to a variety of blogging platforms from within Facebook and update other services, such as Twitter and Pownce, at the time of posting. Consider this a test of that proposition.

Update: Other than an inability to categorize posts and a small formatting issue, Blog It worked amazingly well, updating Twitter immediately upon posting. Nice.

13
Apr

Pecha Kucha Screencast

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Conferences, Podcasting

Unsure what was going to happen to the video recording of the Pecha Kucha, and wanting to share it with those who couldn’t be at Computers in Libraries this year, I went ahead and recorded a screencast of my narrative along with the slides and embedded audio clips. It loses a little something without the live audience, but you’ll get the basic idea.

Let’s try to embed the YouTube version below. The video in avi format at blip.tv is actually of superior quality, but I can only figure out how to embed the flash version and blip.tv’s doesn’t work for most people.

I have since learned that the original Pecha Kucha video is going to be posted on YouTube soon, so I probably spent more time on this than it was worth. Good practice, I suppose.

10
Apr

The CiL Wrap-up Show

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Conferences, Podcasting

Earlier this evening, a group of nine Computers in Libraries attendees came together online to reflect on their conference experiences. The result is Uncontrolled Vocabulary #37.

9
Apr

Presentations

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Conferences, Podcasting

I’ve already had one request for presentation slides from CiL, which seemed fitful motivation to create a separate presentations page. There, you can find a link to my Pecha Kucha slides, as well as my presentations from previous ITI conferences and beyond.

Update: Something’s not right with the Pecha Kucha slides. The file won’t open after the download completes. I’m working on it.

Update 2: OK, there’s now a semi-functional set of PowerPoint slides available on the presentations page, with appropriate instructions for downloading them.