Archive for April, 2005

8
Apr

Podcast Screencast

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Tangent

I downloaded the Camtasia Studio trial version a few weeks back and figured I better do something with it before the 30 days expired. So I decided to give you an inside look at how I create my show and get it ready for podcasting. If you are so inclined, take a look at my first (and probably only) screencast.

The file is quite big. My eight minute movie weighs in at nearly 40 MB. I’m sure that there are ways to compress the file and I probably could have done some editing, but I’ll save exploration of those avenues for future efforts. Consider this a test (with apologies for those who subscribe to the podcast feed, who will receive this whether they want to or not).

Camtasia provides a number of options for what actually gets recorded: a fixed area of the screen, a specific window or the full screen. Because I was switching between applications, I recorded the full screen. This leaves you with a cluttered and unattractive web page sitting next to Audacity the entire time I was recording. Too bad, as there’s a beautiful picture I took of jellyfish at the Monterey Aquarium on my desktop. Oh well, next time.

7
Apr

PAC it in

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Searching

Meredith has two nifty screencasts that accompany her four seven-part series on “The Failure of Middleware” (link is to part 3): screencast 1 and screencast 2.

7
Apr

Um, yeah, the show

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in The Show

I’m having some scheduling problems at the moment, but that’s the problem with free content, right? You only get content when I’m free. In the meantime, go play with the Annotated New York Times.

6
Apr

Podcasting is dope?

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Podcasting

On March 30, Darren Barefoot posted an piece entitled “Why I’m Not Smoking the Podcasting Dope.” I took the time to leave a somewhat lengthy comment on Darren’s site, but thanks to a link over at Evil Genius Chronicles, I suggest you instead read this well-reasoned counterpoint by Shel Holtz.

6
Apr

“Virtual Dave”

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Podcasting

When I saw the announcement of the Bibliocasting listserv yesterday, I became curious about the author of the post, “Virtual Dave” Lankes. Seems like an interesting individual with credits including Executive Director of the Information Institute of Syracuse (IIS), Assistant Professor at Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies and co-founder of AskERIC.

And, as I should have guessed, he’s got a podcast feed. The content is primarily presentations that he’s given. Not a bad use for the format.

5
Apr

Bibliocasting?

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Podcasting

Michael Pate points out the new Bibliocasting listserv.

Let me preface all subsequent comments by saying: this is a great thing. But I do have a question or three.

Bibliocasting, eh? Is this going to be the term of choice? Not my first choice. Or my second. Is it too late to suggest alternatives? LIScasting? LIS Mediacasting? Libraricasting? Infoscicasting? Or really anything that doesn’t implicitly suggest the broadcasting of books (not that there’s anything wrong with that concept).

“The bibliocasting listserv (bibliocasting@…) is
dedicated to a discussion of streaming media in the library
environment.”

Is this the correct application of the term ’streaming media’? I thought of podcasting as being an alternative distribution avenue to streaming, not an example of it, but perhaps I’m mistaken.

“So what to post on the list? Examples of how libraries can build on the growing excitement of Podcasting; Questions on how libraries can use podcasting and other multimedia information they create to promote themselves and provide better service; Questions on how to podcast and other technical questions on streaming media including QuickTime Streaming, RealProducer, and others. In addition, the list will include postings of key articles, reports, and news about podcating and other streaming media in general and in the the library context.”

I’m still under the impression that this is mixing terms, but OK. My question is “Are we talking about multimedia content or are we talking about syndicated multimedia content?” Since you read this blog, you probably believe that all media content should be syndicated and thus it is a pointless distinction. Here here. I just think it’s good to have a clearly-defined scope for a forum.

“Bottom Line: We are looking to build a community of individuals
interested in the application of multimedia in the library
environment.”

Very good. That’d be me, ready to advocate for syndicating the potential offerings.

“We have also set up a podcast for the list…that’s right, you can listen to the list. Each post is transformed from text-to-speech, and syndicated using RSS. The RSS feed (podcast feed) for the list is at:

http://drew.syr.edu/iis4/pod/pod.xml

Very, very cool. It’s almost listenable too. Almost. Sorting out the actual content from all the header info is a bit confusing, but I imagine I’ll get better at it with time. Actually, the best aspect is getting a little insight into the experience of someone who relies on a screenreader (of course, without all of the heinous web navigation obstacles that accompany browsing with a screenreader).

On the whole, I’m enthusiastic about joining this discussion. I’m not all that excited about the listserv approach, but I think with a narrow, clearly-defined focus, it can be effective for discussion and resource sharing. I plan on adding my two cents.

5
Apr

Greatest Screencast Ever?

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Tangent

Jon Udell, who continues to be my online hero, has posted another genius screencast entitled “Content, services, and the yin-yang of intermediation.” This is a must-view. Do it now. Seriously. And if you’re not convinced, read what Richard Akerman has to say about it.

1
Apr

PL Podcasting

   Posted by: Greg Schwartz   in Podcasting

Aaron Schmidt announces the availability of the new Thomas Ford Memorial Library Teen Audio Reviews, which can be received via podcast. Nice! Could this possibly be the first example of a public library providing syndicated audio content?